ETHICS STATEMENT

Ethics Statement

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

 

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the artikel.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published artikel of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the artikels.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the artikel. A artikel should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Artikel
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the artikel, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the artikel and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the artikel.

Our ethical statements are based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

 

Publication decisions

The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.

The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

 

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

 

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

 

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

 

Duties of Reviewers

 

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the article.

 

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

 

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

 

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

 

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published article of which they have personal knowledge.

 

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the articles.

 

Duties of Authors

 

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the article. An article should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

 

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

 

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publications

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

 

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

 

Authorship of the Article

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the article, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and have agreed to its submission for publication.

 

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

 

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the article.

 

Pernyataan etika kami didasarkan pada Pedoman Praktik Terbaik COPE untuk Editor Jurnal.

 

Keputusan publikasi

Editor bertanggung jawab untuk memutuskan artikel mana yang dikirimkan ke jurnal yang harus diterbitkan.

Editor dapat dipandu oleh kebijakan dewan redaksi jurnal dan dibatasi oleh persyaratan hukum seperti yang akan berlaku terkait pencemaran nama baik, pelanggaran hak cipta dan plagiarisme. Editor dapat berunding dengan editor atau pengulas lain dalam membuat keputusan ini.

 

Permainan yang adil

Seorang editor setiap saat mengevaluasi naskah untuk konten intelektual mereka tanpa memandang ras, jenis kelamin, orientasi seksual, keyakinan agama, asal etnis, kewarganegaraan, atau filosofi politik penulis.

 

Kerahasiaan

Editor dan staf editorial mana pun tidak boleh mengungkapkan informasi apa pun tentang naskah yang dikirimkan kepada siapa pun selain penulis yang sesuai, pengulas, calon pengulas, penasihat editorial lain, dan penerbit, sebagaimana mestinya.

 

Pengungkapan dan konflik kepentingan

Materi yang tidak dipublikasikan yang diungkapkan dalam naskah yang dikirimkan tidak boleh digunakan dalam penelitian editor sendiri tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari penulis.

 

Tugas Reviewer

 

Kontribusi untuk Keputusan Editorial

Peer review membantu editor dalam membuat keputusan editorial dan melalui komunikasi editorial dengan penulis juga dapat membantu penulis dalam memperbaiki artikel.

 

Kecepatan

Setiap wasit terpilih yang merasa tidak memenuhi syarat untuk meninjau penelitian yang dilaporkan dalam sebuah manuskrip atau mengetahui bahwa tinjauan segera tidak mungkin dilakukan, harus memberi tahu editor dan mengundurkan diri dari proses peninjauan.

 

Kerahasiaan

Setiap manuskrip yang diterima untuk ditinjau harus diperlakukan sebagai dokumen rahasia. Mereka tidak boleh diperlihatkan atau didiskusikan dengan orang lain kecuali sebagaimana diizinkan oleh editor.

 

Standar Objektivitas

Review harus dilakukan secara objektif. Kritik pribadi terhadap penulis tidak pantas. Wasit harus mengungkapkan pandangan mereka dengan jelas dengan argumen pendukung.

 

Pengakuan Sumber

Reviewer harus mengidentifikasi karya relevan yang diterbitkan yang belum dikutip oleh penulis. Setiap pernyataan bahwa pengamatan, derivasi, atau argumen telah dilaporkan sebelumnya harus disertai dengan kutipan yang relevan. Peninjau juga harus meminta perhatian editor setiap kesamaan substansial atau tumpang tindih antara manuskrip yang sedang dipertimbangkan dan artikel lain yang diterbitkan yang mereka ketahui secara pribadi.

 

Pengungkapan dan Benturan Kepentingan

Informasi atau ide istimewa yang diperoleh melalui peer review harus dijaga kerahasiaannya dan tidak digunakan untuk keuntungan pribadi. Peninjau tidak boleh mempertimbangkan manuskrip yang mereka miliki benturan kepentingan yang timbul dari persaingan, kolaboratif, atau hubungan atau koneksi lain dengan penulis, perusahaan, atau institusi mana pun yang terkait dengan artikel.

 

Tugas Penulis

 

Standar pelaporan

Penulis laporan penelitian asli harus menyajikan laporan yang akurat tentang pekerjaan yang dilakukan serta diskusi objektif tentang signifikansinya. Data yang mendasari harus terwakili secara akurat dalam artikel. Sebuah artikel harus berisi detail dan referensi yang cukup untuk memungkinkan orang lain mereplikasi karya tersebut. Pernyataan yang menipu atau secara sengaja tidak akurat merupakan perilaku yang tidak etis dan tidak dapat diterima.

 

Orisinalitas dan Plagiarisme

Penulis harus memastikan bahwa mereka telah menulis sepenuhnya karya asli, dan jika penulis telah menggunakan karya dan/atau kata-kata orang lain, maka ini telah dikutip atau dikutip dengan tepat.

 

Publikasi Berganda, Berlebihan, atau Bersamaan

Seorang penulis tidak boleh secara umum menerbitkan manuskrip yang menggambarkan penelitian yang pada dasarnya sama di lebih dari satu jurnal atau publikasi utama. Mengirimkan naskah yang sama ke lebih dari satu jurnal secara bersamaan merupakan perilaku penerbitan yang tidak etis dan tidak dapat diterima.

 

Pengakuan Sumber

Pengakuan yang tepat atas karya orang lain harus selalu diberikan. Penulis harus mengutip publikasi yang berpengaruh dalam menentukan sifat karya yang dilaporkan.

 

Penulisan Artikel

Kepengarangan harus dibatasi pada mereka yang telah memberikan kontribusi signifikan terhadap konsepsi, desain, pelaksanaan, atau interpretasi studi yang dilaporkan. Semua orang yang telah memberikan kontribusi signifikan harus dicantumkan sebagai rekan penulis. Jika ada orang lain yang telah berpartisipasi dalam aspek substantif tertentu dari proyek penelitian, mereka harus diakui atau terdaftar sebagai kontributor. Penulis korespondensi harus memastikan bahwa semua rekan penulis yang sesuai dan tidak ada rekan penulis yang tidak pantas disertakan dalam artikel, dan bahwa semua rekan penulis telah melihat dan menyetujui versi final artikel dan telah menyetujui pengajuannya untuk dipublikasikan.

 

Pengungkapan dan Benturan Kepentingan

Semua penulis harus mengungkapkan dalam naskah mereka setiap konflik kepentingan keuangan atau substantif lainnya yang mungkin ditafsirkan untuk mempengaruhi hasil atau interpretasi naskah mereka. Semua sumber dukungan keuangan untuk proyek harus diungkapkan.

 

Kesalahan mendasar dalam karya yang diterbitkan

Ketika seorang penulis menemukan kesalahan atau ketidakakuratan yang signifikan dalam karyanya yang diterbitkan, adalah kewajiban penulis untuk segera memberi tahu editor jurnal atau penerbit dan bekerja sama dengan editor untuk menarik kembali atau memperbaiki artikel tersebut.